Peer review process

The galleys presented will be subject to scrutiny by editors, authors and external evaluators. Said process of counting will not exceed six months.

The process is the following:

The editors will receive the manuscript and will judge separately the academic value of the manuscript. This first analysis will not exceed three months.

The adaptation to the norms of publication is a task common to the editors, but not the examination of the content, which will be conducted upon the expertise of our collaborators. The manuscript will be submitted to the judgment of one or more external evaluators. This subsequent examination may not exceed three months.

The anonymity of the authors of the manuscripts is not guaranteed; we firmly believe in the impartiality and ethics of our editors.

The manuscripts integrated in the series “eXcogito” will obtain the quality of “essays”, not “academic papers”, therefore the review process in this case will be more permissive: the acceptance of the managing editor will suffice.

Finally, the manuscripts will be reviewed by a specialist philologist and designed using a professional word processor.

Skip to toolbar